Prediction of Ji Sung Nam [681st] vs Naoki Nakagawa [356th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L L
Form
L L W W W L W L L WHead-2-Head: Nam 1 - 0 Nakagawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 0. The last match between Nam and Nakagawa was at the Yokohama Challenger, 17-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ji Sung Nam | 1 |
| Naoki Nakagawa | 0 |
| Nam | Stats | Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (6-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 681 | Ranking | 356 |
| 236 | Highest Rank | 334 |
| 31 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 56% (294-230) | Career Total W/L | 61% (325-212) |
| $1,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:16 | Average Match Time | 1:6:16 |
| 57% (28/49) | 1st Serve % | 66% (38/58) |
| 93% (26/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 43% (25/58) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ji Sung Nam vs Naoki Nakagawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 0 Nakagawa
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 33.73% of points on their second serve, while Nakagawa has won 48.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa has won 43.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.69% and 25.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 40.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakagawa has saved 50.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 19/ 18), with Nakagawa winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 245/ 180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 112/ 75).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13), where as Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nam winning 1 times and Nakagawa being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 0. The last match between Nam and Nakagawa was at the Yokohama Challenger, 17-11-2024, Q3, Hard with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Nakagawa have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nam winning 0 times and Nakagawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Nakagawa 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 380.35 while Nakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 424.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakagawa has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakagawa has converted 27.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryo Tabata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Ryo Tabata
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Junhyun Lee
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Issei Okamura
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Katsutoshi Suzuki
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ji Sung Nam
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Rannmaru Kozuma
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Ajeet Rai
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Kody Pearson
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Collin Altamirano
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
76%
(
81 of
106)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
91)
1
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nam vs Nakagawa?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nam Vs Nakagawa is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (294/230) | Win/Loss | 61% (325/212) |
| 56% (660/527) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (725/531) |
| 52% (5745/5248) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6270/5689) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 974 | Aces Total | 1853 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 914 | Total Double Faults | 1064 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:49 |
| 575.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.35 |
| 65% (13501/20725) | 1st Serve % | 57% (15908/27926) |
| 68% (9117/13501) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (11042/15908) |
| 49% (3511/7224) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6045/12018) |
| 44% (1081/2443) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1164/2761) |
| 43% (9265/21715) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11082/28047) |
| 56% (286/512) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (321/531) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 53% (71/135) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (99/173) |
| 47% (68/144) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (106/182) |
| 86% (291/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (296/259) |
| 14% (291/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (296/37) |
| 19% (232/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (241/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
